The article discusses several precautions that have been implemented to stop widespread of the cane toad in Australia and provide three ways of prevention. However, the professor explains that stopping spread of the cane toad will not be easy as the article describes. She states that these ways were unsuccessful in their approach and led to environmental damage.
First, the reading states that building national fence prevents the toad from spreading to other places that are not colonized yet. The professor refute this point by explaining that the fence will not be effective to stop the rapid movement of the cane toad because their eggs can carry out to other places by using water streams. And since the fence is not build on water way; it would be useless.
Second, the article claims that an easy way to prevent the toad cane from spreading was capturing and destroying them by volunteers. On the other hand, the professor states that those untrained group of people may be captured toad cane. However, they also could capture and destroy frog population for the reason they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog and the toad cane. Because both of these animals are relatively similar and it could very difficult recognizing them.
Third, the reading avers that developing of certain virus, that causing disease, that specifically attacks the toad can and would decline their populations. In contrast, the professor explains the negative consequences of using the viral method to other animal populations. She states that certain reptile species, amphibian animals are living in South America, are also infected by this virus because they are traveling from the infected places. As a result, they are disturbing ecological system in these areas. Since the toad cane is native in South America and part of the biological ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...at are not colonized yet. The professor refute this point by explaining that the fence...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on for the reason that they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog and t...
^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...She states that certain reptile species, amphibian animals are living in South Am...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14052287582 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58822085227 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2406096707 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515679574685 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172284706918 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104198095354 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313521480827 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034233664272 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.