TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec

The lecturer argues against the three measures mentioned in the reading passage to reduce the population of the cane toad, a species introduced to the Australian continent.
The lecturer argues that the first measure, a national fence, would not prevent the flow of streams or rivers and, therefore, would allow young toads or toad eggs to travel to the other side of the fence. The reading passage, however, argues that such a fence would effectively cut off the Route that animals use to establish colonies and expand in population.
Regarding the second measure, recruiting a large group of volunteers, the lecturer explains that volunteers often have difficulty distinguishing between cane toads and native frogs, an endangered species. Therefore, volunteers might kill members of both species. The Reading passage gives the opposite view. Organizing a large group of volunteers to join an extermination campaign would speed the destruction of cane toads.
Finally the lecturer objects to the third measure—using an infectious virus. She points out that a virus intended to eliminate Australia’s cane toad population could be transmitted through animal transportation to other continents where cane toads are an essential part of the ecosystem. This is indirect contradiction with the claim in the reading passage that an infectious virus could be developed to stop the reproduction of cane toads without harming other species.

Votes
Average: 4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...such as small native animals. Some ways is suggested by writing to stop their risi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 12.0772626932 8% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 22.412803532 4% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 30.3222958057 13% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 223.0 1373.03311258 16% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 45.0 270.72406181 17% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95555555556 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.59002006411 4.04702891845 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.288349451 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 44.0 145.348785872 30% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.977777777778 0.540411800872 181% => OK
syllable_count: 67.5 419.366225166 16% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 13.0662251656 15% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22317462956 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131912774581 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106616992734 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22317462956 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 63.6247240618 22% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.