TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec
The reading states that cane toad species was intentionally introduced to Australia with the expectation that it would rescue the crop of the farmers by eating harmful insects. Moreover, sadly, the result was not the one they expected because they multiplied swiftly, and this vast population threatens small native animals. The passage provides three strategies to avoid the distribution of the cane toad in Australia. However, the professor comments that none of these approaches are useful for solving this matter and refutes each of the solutions.
First, the passage claims that building a national fence would be one possible solution to avoid the distribution of the toad. Moreover, this method has been implemented in another place before, and there is no need for being worried about its consequences. The lecturer, meanwhile, makes the argument that it is improbable to limit young toads from moving because they use rivers and streams to flow from one place to another.
Second, although the reading passage asserts that the toads could be easily captured and diminished by some volunteers, the professor disagrees and believes that this can be harmful if the collectors would be some inexperienced people. She adds that because they can damage some other species like frogs which live near the river or the streams close to the toad eggs.
Third, in contrast to the lecture which posits that some researchers are making a disease-causing virus to manage and control toad populations, the lecturer says that this idea is trouble-making. She strongly comments that this virus can make some difficulties in the original habitat of some endangered animals because they are an important part of the whole ecosystem. Thus, If they eliminate toads from the place, some other species related to these animals availability may suffer from this disappearance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ce, some other species related to these animals availability may suffer from this disap...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, thus, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2861952862 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78466038469 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569023569024 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0889141181 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390233014345 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146021453221 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771039968874 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236141375255 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047069791195 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.