TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec

he article discusses several precaustions that have been implemented to stop widespread of the cane toad in Australia and provide three ways of prevention. However, the professor explains that stopping spread of the cane toad will not be easy as the article describes. She states that these ways were un successful in their approach and led to environmental damage.

First, the reading states that building national fence prevents the toad fence from spreading to other places that are not colonized yet. The prfoessor refute this point by explaining that the fence will not be effective to stop the rapid movement of the cane toad because their egges can carry out to other places by using water streams. And since the fence is not build on water way; itwould be is useless.

Second, the article cliams that an easy way to prevent the toad cane from spreading was capturing and destroying them by voulnters. On the other hand, the professor states that those untrained group of people may be captured toad cane. However, they also could capture and destroy frog poplulation for the reason that they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog and the toad cane. Because both of these animals are realively similar and it could very difficult recoginizing them.

Third, the reading avers that developing of certain virus, that causing diseas, that specifically attacks the toad cane and make decline in their populations. In contrast, the professor explains the negative consequences of using the viral method to other animal popluations. She states that certain repitle species, amphibian animals are living in South America, are also infected by this virus because they are travelling from the infected places. As a result, they are disturbing ecological system in these areas. Since the toad cane is native and part of the biological ecosysem.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he article discusses several precaustions ...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'articles'.
Suggestion: articles
he article discusses several precaustions that hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on for the reason that they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that they are lacking the acknowledge to distinguish between the young frog and t...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...She states that certain repitle species, amphibian animals are living in South Am...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16393442623 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59870763572 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6396631657 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506979691664 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167777015826 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104082611974 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306358570696 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297522232921 0.0443174109184 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.