TPO 16
The passage states that there are serious problems and limitations in Britain, which old cultural artifacts are faced with them and provides three of these problems that the science ofarchaeology studied. The lecturer, nevertheless, disproves these problems and explains that construction projects changed and improved all three ideas.
First, the article claims that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects and builders did not preserve the artifacts. Conversely, the lecturer opposes thi point by saying that the valuable sites have to be examined by builders and archaeologists. The professor contends that they make a plan to preserving the archaeologically percious artifacts.
In addition, the reading posits that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate through goverment funds and grants. On the other hand, the professor argues that financial support will be paid by construction company. According to the lecturer, new construction in British cities, towns are new sources of financial support for archaeologists.
Finally, the passage expresses that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology and there were never many positions available. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that there are lots of career for archaeologists before starting the construction project. We also learn the number of carees will be increased by examining the site, preserving plans and processing the data.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78240740741 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13499088786 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.348898702 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371309711758 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128687557735 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729837930297 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19753095578 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500517518136 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.