Reading and lecture talks about the decline in birds population due to
increase in urbanization. Article argues that human assassination to the natural
land might jeopardize life of the birds species, while lecture states that reasons for that
mentioned in the passage are not logical. Lecture throws light on the her opinion in the
following essay:
Firstly, reading posits that maximum portion of land is covered to satisfy human needs such
as homes, factories and other institutions. Therefore, there is not adequate land available
to protect species of birds. In contrast, lecture thinks urban growth promotes development of the most bird species such as pigeon, hawks and sea gals via larger habitat. As a result, there might be actual increase in the number of birds rather than
decrease.
Secondly, article claims that many wilderness areas are converted in to fertile land for agriculture. Thus,
many birds species do not possess nests to survive. Lecture challenges this statement made in the lecture. She thinks that advancement of technology in agricultural field enable farmers can grow efficient and large quantities of crops in small area of land. In addition, she witnesses that every year amount of land under agriculture is plummeting.
Thirdly, article asserts that pesticides used to eradicate pests in that process harmful insects mixes with water. Thus, large population of birds can die by consuming that water and thereby jeopardizing their growth. However, professor thinks that nowadays less toxic pesticides are invented due to continues research. This can brought two changes;first it crops produced will be genetically pesticide resistant and these crops do not affect birds numbers. As a consequence, professor successfully cast doubt against points made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the decline in birds population due to increase in urbanization. Article argues...
^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that human assassination to the natural land might jeopardize life of the birds ...
^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ral land might jeopardize life of the birds species, while lecture states that reas...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile lecture states that reasons for that mentioned in the passage are not logical...
^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'her'?
Suggestion: the; her
...re not logical. Lecture throws light on the her opinion in the following essay: Fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e throws light on the her opinion in the following essay: Firstly, reading pos...
^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is covered to satisfy human needs such as homes, factories and other institutio...
^^^
Line 8, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, there is not adequate land available to protect species of birds. In contrast...
^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease in the number of birds rather than decrease. Secondly, article claims th...
^^^
Line 12, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to fertile land for agriculture. Thus, many birds species do not possess nests ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52688172043 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76709008782 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.702068294 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32232453628 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889885867637 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591725795795 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977057340726 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770747464569 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.