TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people

In the lecture, the speaker discusses why the three accusations on buzzing mentioned in the passage are not reasonable.

To begin with, the reading claims that people are likely to be misguided by buzzers if they are not aware of their real motivations. Nonetheless, the lecturer refutes this and argues that buzzers recruited by the company are all users of the product to be provided. Hence, they can provide genuine and first-hand information to consumers instead of cheating them.

Next, contrary to the second statement in the reading passage that, since buzzers seem to be normal people, consumers believe what they say unconditionally, the student in the listening points out people are not that thoughtless and impressionable. Using himself as an example, he said that when he was buzzing to others, people bombarded him with a number of questions to make sure the product is really as good as it is said to be.

Finally, the speaker rules out the possibility that buzzers would be considered untrustworthy once their identities were discovered by consumers. Because buzzers really had a nice experience using the products or services they are promoting and like it very much, it will definitely benefit the people who believe the buzzers and try the product, even they discovered the true identity of buzzers.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, nonetheless, really, second, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86917537849 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7106022632 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370489859675 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145854468295 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640214513253 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196511031181 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895670011541 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.