The reading states that buzzer should be proscribed and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor asserts the author sentiment is misleading and provide wrong impression to public, and confutes each of the author's choice.
First, the passage claims that customer could be mislead while buzzing about a product. The professor confutes this points by saying that most of the people are buzzers, are actually using the same products. The professor explains that company hire those people who use the it's product and like the company product, so their praising will be authentic.
Second, the reading maintains that customer will be less attentive while buzzer are describing the product. The professor, however, refutes that point. According to professor, people are more aware while describing the product: they will ask about it's price, function. If buzzer are unable to say about it then people will be more wary about the products.
Third, The passage contends that it will impair social relationship between buzzer and his peers. The professor counter this point by explaining that it will not affect on their relationship. Further,we have came to know that, people, who are buzzer, are actually admirer of these product. At first they have tested the product, and if they find them genuine, then only they become buzzer; thus, preventing from providing distorted information to people, which protects their social relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
... that company hire those people who use the its product and like the company product, s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey will ask about its price, function. If buzzer are unable to say about it then ...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...is point by explaining that it will not affect on their relationship. Further,we have cam...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...ot affect on their relationship. Further,we have came to know that, people, who are...
^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
... on their relationship. Further,we have came to know that, people, who are buzzer, a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ther,we have came to know that, people, who are buzzer, are actually admirer of these p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'these products'?
Suggestion: this product; these products
...who are buzzer, are actually admirer of these product. At first they have tested the product,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38596491228 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50846520024 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574561403509 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6368508829 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4615384615 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310183505973 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108836199374 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743430003393 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180007843778 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789188975417 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.