tpo 2 integrated writing

The reading states that gathering people in a group can be more effective than individuals and provides three reasons for it. However, The professor explains that putting individuals in a group is not a good idea and refutes each if the reading reasons.
Firs, the reading avers that a group people wiil have more experience to deal with every possible problem. nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on the reading purport by providing an example of two company. He explains that the proficiency of two groups were investigated for 6 month. the first group didn't show a good randeman. the second group that has good performance were analyzed through their members and every one of them refutes the passage idea.
Second, the passage claims that a group can do jobs in a short time and faster thatan individuals. howeveer, The professor refutes this point. He avers that people in a group needs more time to finalize their idea. He says that more meeting is neccessary to achieve a idea and that is a complete waste of time.
Third, the reading asserts that a group of people will emerge more creative idea due to variety of people and different mind also it mentios that in a group all the peple are united in a same voice. Nonetheless, the professor cast doubt on these. He explains that all the people in a group must admit the idea, eventhough they think that it wont be a good idea. After the acceptance if the programm fails all of the member in group are responsibble for that and this is not the meaning of creative, were some people agree and some not.

Votes
Average: 3.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... states that gathering people in a group can be more effective than individuals a...
^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ce to deal with every possible problem. nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on the readin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...y of two groups were investigated for 6 month. the first group didnt show a good rand...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...o groups were investigated for 6 month. the first group didnt show a good randeman....
^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...vestigated for 6 month. the first group didnt show a good randeman. the second group ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...first group didnt show a good randeman. the second group that has good performance ...
^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Howeveer
...ort time and faster thatan individuals. howeveer, The professor refutes this point. He a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t more meeting is neccessary to achieve a idea and that is a complete waste of ti...
^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, the professor cast doubt on these. He explains that all the people in a group...
^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r cast doubt on these. He explains that all the people in a group must admit the...
^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...er the acceptance if the programm fails all of the member in group are responsibble for th...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67028985507 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50717045625 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496376811594 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.101224525 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9333333333 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.