TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama

The article claims that the "let it burn" policy was not good. For the 1988 forest fires in Yellowstone national park, which have not been controlled in the first place as a result of the "let it burn" policy, caused serious problems. Problems include the tremendous damage of the forest, mascarade of small animals, and the decrease in the number of tourists after the fire. However, the professor thinks that the "let it burn" policy has its good impact on the environment. She refuses the statement in the article by three points.

First, the scorched area in Yellowstone is the heaven of small plants and animals now. The ashes of old big plants became the nutrition of small plants. And the later could have more space to grow.

Second, small animals began to nourish after the vegetation of these scorched areas. As soon as the vegetation came back, small animals, like rabbits and hares, could obtain sufficient food at this region. Furthermore, the proliferate of small mammals provide food for larger predators, which came back to the land as well.

Third, more and more tourists came back to Yellowstone after the fire. The decrease of tourism was just a temporary thing. In other words, as long as the catastrophes like the big fire do not happen, people would continue traveling to Yellowstone.

All in all, the professor suggests that the "let it burn" policy has a creative impact on the local environment.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., small animals, like rabbits and hares, could obtain sufficient food at this reg...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cient food at this region. Furthermore, the proliferate of small mammals provide food for large...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, well, as a result, in other words, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0867768595 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63549883482 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54132231405 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0246764559 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0666666667 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27419852223 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852720472148 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750468031277 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129689889407 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835722172585 0.0443174109184 189% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.