The reading passage contends that there are three kinds of damage caused by “let it burn” policy which be criticized by critics of the policy. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the idea in the reading passage that the national park’s trees and other vegetation are tremendously damaged by Yellowstone fires. This is because even large vegetation are damaged, it give a lot of opportunities for small plants to germinate themselves. Those plants have been pressured by large vegetation. However, after large vegetation was burned, they are able to take over where large trees have located. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the idea in the reading passage that Yellowstone fires affected the park wildlife. This is because it can recover its population as well as give opportunities for small animals. Also, it provides them to have ideal habitats. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea in the reading passage that the value of the park was compromised by the fires, which results in negative consequences for the local economy. It is obvious that the Yellowstone fires were unusual combination of strong wind and other factors, which was massive damage on the park at that time. After the fires, there is no fire as massive as the Yellowstone fires. As a result, the reading passage’s final point is refuted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...e even large vegetation are damaged, it give a lot of opportunities for small plants...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257425742574 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.148514851485 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0924092409241 0.0723426182421 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.042904290429 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.029702970297 0.0277247811725 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108910891089 0.128828473217 85% => OK
Participles: 0.036303630363 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89442986404 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00990099009901 0.0208969081088 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00660066006601 0.00154638098197 427% => OK
Determiners: 0.112211221122 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.003300330033 0.0158828679856 21% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.019801980198 0.0114777025283 173% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1575.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 252.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361111111111 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301587301587 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202380952381 0.187439937562 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134920634921 0.113142543107 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89442986404 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 49.9969401492 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4545438384 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 132.220823453 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.9587301587 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.82089552239 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.648003665953 0.549887131256 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144368172369 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0970424737385 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528463421646 0.631733273073 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150068033333 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256187332701 0.266732575781 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175394540597 0.103435571967 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410248423807 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103950702611 0.0530846634433 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.471981132115 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968816966176 0.0528353158467 183% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.