Although the author suggests three main hypotheses to state the advantages of genetically modified trees that produce more fruits, grow faster and tolerate in harsh condition, the professor in the lecture finds all reasons dubious and brings up three main points to refute them all.
The first reason is that genetically modified trees are more resistant than natural trees in harsh condition. For example, in Hawaii, the pest-resistant papaya trees are more likely to withstand from virus infection. However, the lecturer states that natural trees that are genetically diverse are more resistent in harsh condition. Even if some of their speices cannot survive in that condition, they have some individual trees that can persist in harsh condition. However, due to the unformity of gentics in genetically modified trees they cannot withstand the undesired condition such as climate change and insect invasion.
Secondly, the reading matreial argues that genetically modified trees are financially beneficial since they grow faster with great yeild and more income with less pesticides. In contrast, the professor holds the view that genetically modified trees have some hidden costs. Companies have to spend more money on genetically modified trees since they have to pay farmers. In addition, it is illegall to grow plants without permission and companies have to pay for it.
Finally, the reading passage believes that genetically modified trees causes natural and wild trees, particularly scarce trees, survive from overplant. On the other hand, the speaker gainsays this idea and states that genetically modified trees make the situation that natural trees compete with them for resources such as sun light, soil nutrient and water. Since they are grown amongst natural trees, they may cause outcompete and decline the population of native trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pesticides is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r with great yeild and more income with less pesticides. In contrast, the professor ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51398601399 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5931258978 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513986013986 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2731786589 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484059286627 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202685932921 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075149178912 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295628911793 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721184437608 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.