The reading and lecture both are discussed about ethanol fuel. While the reading states that ethanol are not a good alternative of gasoline and the passage provides three reasons to support. The professor refutes this points, say that this reasons are not convincing to determined ethanol are not a good alternative fuel.
First of all, the reading claims ethanol are not able to solve the fuel problem rather it creates problem like global warming, increase of carbon dioxide. However, the lecture refutes this points by saying that ethanol are not actually add carbon dioxide. Ethanol fuel produced from corn tree but tree actually absorb the carbon dioxide from environment. In ethanol production process not increase carbon dioxide rather it reduce carbon dioxide.
Secondly, the reading posits that production of ethanol reduce the animals food because all animal food are used for ethanol production. However, the lecture disagree with that he think that life not facing problem when ethanol production increased, because only west part of tree are used for ethanol production and core part used for animals foods.
Finally, The reading passage argues that ethanol are not able to compete with gasoline on prices, because price of ethanol production are high and government provides subsidies that reduce the price at gasoline level.The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that if production are increased the price of ethanol is reduce. If ethanol production are three times greater than recent production than it's price reduce 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...s not increase carbon dioxide rather it reduce carbon dioxide. Secondly, the readin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading posits that production of ethanol reduce the animals food because all anim...
^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... that production of ethanol reduce the animals food because all animal food are used f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use all animal food are used for ethanol production. However, the lecture disagre...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat life not facing problem when ethanol production increased, because only west ...
^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e high and government provides subsidies that reduce the price at gasoline level....
^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...that reduce the price at gasoline level.The lecture refutes this claim by pointing ...
^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...n are increased the price of ethanol is reduce. If ethanol production are three times ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...creased the price of ethanol is reduce. If ethanol production are three times grea...
^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t production than its price reduce 40%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35918367347 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38160379816 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461224489796 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1197337518 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461151319295 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198893060935 0.0996497079465 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557929644403 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28647439017 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325189687256 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.