TPO 23
The author postulates several reasons for the decline in yellow cedar tree's population. The lecturer, however, explains that points made by the author are not sufficient, and he is not right about them.
First, the author states that insect parasites, specifically cedar bark beetles, could be a contributing factor to yellow cedar decline. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that healthy trees have chemical compounds in their leaves with which the trees become resistant to parasites. For this reason, insects can only infest dammaged trees, and those that will die in near future. Thus, insects are not causing the population decline.
Second, the author contends that brown bears also contribute to yellow cedar decline, providing that they claw cedars in order to consume their high sugar barks. On the otherhand, the lecturer argues that yellow cedar decline in areas in which no brown bears exists, indicates that brown bears are not considered as a major contributing factor.
Third, the author believes that climate changes towards colder climates makes yellow cedars' roots vulnerable to freezing. In contrast, the lecturer suggests that population decline in warmer regions has been higher than colder regions', therefore, climate could not be a considerable factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asites, specifically cedar bark beetles, could be a contributing factor to yellow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47236180905 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5144917219 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2676103252 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364185036736 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136938903788 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677677643142 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201927619963 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504500545884 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.