In northwestern North America, population of the yellow cedar decline gradually. The article presents three hypotheses behind the decline population. Whereas, in the lecture, the professor casts about the specific hypothesis of the author and says that it is not satisfactory hypothesis.
Firstly, the passage claims that cedar bark beetle is one kinds of insect parasite is responsible for plummet the population of the yellow cedar. The beetle larvae eat the wood and constant attack causes kill the yellow cedar. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that healthy yellow cedar resistant to specific insect in specially cedar bark beetle. Bark and leave of yellow cedar saturate with powerful chemical and when the insect the attack the yellow cedar, chemical release which is resistant to insect. Cedar bark beetle eats dead seeds which is not harm to trees.
Secondly, the author emphasizes that bears vigorously eat the high sugar content bark causes the damage and weaken to yellow cedar tree, eventually, die the tree. However, the speaker explains that bears eat on some of the bark trees but they are not spread on the whole North America. Yellow cedar spread in the North America mainland and island but bear's population not in the islands. Therefore, with and without dears are not reasons that decline the yellow cedar trees.
Lastly, the article implies that climate change and freezing cold night affect the root system which causes the decline yellow cedar trees. On the contrary, the professor states that author forgive to mentions that lower elevation of warmer environment trees more decline trees population than high elevation of colder environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one kind', 'a kind', or simply 'kinds'?
Suggestion: one kind; a kind; kinds
...assage claims that cedar bark beetle is one kinds of insect parasite is responsible for p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the speaker explains that bears eat on some of the bark trees but they are not spread on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28947368421 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41634588951 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488721804511 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1453316479 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447277587734 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174512584474 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708167024165 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263075899786 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655993429562 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.