TPO 24

Essay topics:

TPO 24

The author believes that certain evidence indicates that some body tissue is found by researchers inside a leg bone of T. rex. The lecturer, however, explains why the author is not right about his points, and the evidence does not neccassary indicate existance of body tissue.

First, the author states that there are small hollow channels found inside the bone in which a soft material exists, and the soft materials are probably blood vessels. The lecturer refutes the author's statement by asserting that bacteria sometimes leave similar material behind, therefore, the material is probably left-over of bacteria activity.

Second, the author contends that spheres were found that were the same size as red blood cells, and contained iron which is an indispensible compound of red blood cells. The lecturer opposes the author arguing that same spheres were found in the remaining of other species in the area that lack red blood cells. Thus, the spheres are probably some red colored minerals.

Finally, the author claims that amounts of collagen, which is a compound in bone tissue, were found inside the leg bone. On the otherhand, the lecturer counters the author's claim by suggesting that collagen cannot remain for more than a thousand years, whereas T. rex lived 70 million years ago. For this reason, he thinks that the collagen relates to another source, such as humans skin. He states that the collagen could have come from the researchers' hands handling the bone.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...es that certain evidence indicates that some body tissue is found by researchers inside a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blooded'.
Suggestion: blooded
...ts, and the soft materials are probably blood vessels. The lecturer refutes the autho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...blood vessels. The lecturer refutes the authors statement by asserting that bacteria so...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37338695632 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54958677686 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1160086842 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346238128986 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129168830187 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810403048224 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189170757767 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715564741061 0.0443174109184 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.