Reading and lecture discusses about vessels filled with liquids that could have been used as batteries in olden times. Reading argues that there is no possibility these vessels were used as electric batteries, while lecturer thinks that arguments made in reading are unconvincing.
First, article posits that the source of electricity should be connected with metal wires to enable transfer of electrons in order to use vessels as batteries. However, when vessels were excavated they failed to prove that. In contrast, professor thinks that people in that era were not knowledgeable about metal wires, so they might not have recognized those wires in surrounding.As a result, professor witnesses that metal wires must have been missed by local people.
Second, reading implies that copper cylinder founded in the region probably used to store texts and
scroll. Professor casts doubt on the statement made in lecture. She thinks that copper cylinder must have served
purpose of generating electricity. Because copper being conductor of electricity used for one purpose might be
adapted for different use.
Third, reading states that without the device to use electricity, vessels might not have been used by archaic people. In contrary, lecturer thinks that tingling created by vessels was considered as a magic in olden times. In addition, she points out that modern doctors even use battery currents to stimulate muscles activity in denervated patients. As a consequence, it can be used for healing and to alleviate pain and aches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...e recognized those wires in surrounding.As a result, professor witnesses that meta...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... region probably used to store texts and scroll. Professor casts doubt on the sta...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lectricity used for one purpose might be adapted for different use. Third, rea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40495867769 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64798340871 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582644628099 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0887985333 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423880954267 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143953407068 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672477645036 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18129635677 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690667223382 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.