The article discusses the invasion of zebra mussels cannot be stopped, so they pose a serious threat to fish populations across the North America. The author provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that the zebra mussel migration do not pose any danger for fish populations and he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the spread of zebra mussel might be unstoppable because zebra attach it self to ships bottom. The professor opposes this point by explaining that this point was true in the past in the case of mussels invaded Europe. He adds that today, there are many effective ways to prevent zebra from spreading. For example, refilled the bottom of ships with ocean water, the salt in that water will be able kill zebra mussel effectively.
Second, the article posits that since zebra mussels are carried to new inhabitat, they will dominate the area. The professor, on the other hand, states that this domination is just only in the beginning time. He explains that birds will adopt themselves for these new food resources and begin to feed on zebra mussels. Therefore, because of birds usually eat a lot, they will devastate zebra mussels populations and they no longer able to control the area.
Third, the reading avers that zebra mussels are likely to cause damage in fish populations, since they are plankton eaters. The professor refutes this point by saying that even though zebra mussels are plankton eaters and would cause harm to this certain population , they can be a good source of food nutrients for other fish populations. He concludes that mussels can have negative impacts on planktons, but they will provide many positive impacts on bottom fish populations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...ght be unstoppable because zebra attach it self to ships bottom. The professor opposes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ld cause harm to this certain population , they can be a good source of food nutri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04498269896 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42113170146 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7209554809 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457016849085 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16509723906 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896407098886 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28419232918 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436649963564 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.