Both lecture and article discuss the little ice age period in which cold temperature. According to the passage, the author provides three reasons for little ice age. Whereas, the lecturer says that article present the outdated data and contradict the each outline of the article.
Firstly, the reading passage implies that disturbance in ocean current causes decreases the temperature. Gulf Stream collects the large water from the glacier melting ice and it directly effects on the earth's climate. In contrast with this, the speaker explains that Gulf Stream only affects the North America and Europe but not affect in the other country such as New Zealand and Africa. Therefore, Gulf Stream not responsible for the cooler climate of the earth.
Secondly, the article emphasizes that volcanic eruption produces a large amount of the dust and sulfur gas which prevent sunlight to reaching earth surface. On the contrary with this, the lecturer mentions that if the large amount of dust produces then we could visualize such as a color of the sunset and snow gray. So, the volcanic eruption is a reason for decrease temperature is unconvincing.
Thirdly, the author states that decrease the human population causes decrease the usage of the forest trees. As result, trees absorb the carbon dioxide which is greenhouse gases and decrease the temperature. On the other hand, the professor points out that, the human population quickly recover and demand of forest not decrease but increase for food. So, forest not help to decline the temperature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ting ice and it directly effects on the earths climate. In contrast with this, the spe...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ectly effects on the earths climate. In contrast with this, the speaker explains that Gu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5035526757 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9833779772 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336543290506 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10698353244 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065424402306 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17498332805 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274631643055 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.