The reading states that Robert E. Peary who is a famous adventurer had a trip to the North poleon April 7, 1909 , and provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor argues that the evidences in the listening passage are not convincing, and refutes each of the mentioned reasons.
First, the reading states that a commitee was instucted by the National Geographic Society in order to conduct a research on whether Peary had reached to the North Pole or not. The committee based on the records and Peary's equipment reached to dicision that he indeed reached to the North Pole. However, the professor claims that a committee had consisted Peary's close friend and he would wish to gain money from his adventure.Therefore, the committee's explanation and decisions could be biased.
Second, the reading posits that a recent expedition, Tom Avery's expedition, supports that Peary probably reached the North Pole from Ellesmere Island in only 37 days. The professor, however, refutes this point by saying that it is true that Tom Avery's sled was similar to the Peary's,but ,in fact, the weight of Peary's sled is slightly higher than Avery's. Because, Peary had carried the food by sled, yet Avery had got his food falled from the plane. In addition, the weather circumstance were different too. Avery experienced the proper condition in comparison to Peary.
Third, the reading states that the photographs taken by Peary support his claim. Since, sun's position in the photograph and the measuring the sahdow in Peary photographs cleary support Peary's claim. In the listetning , the professor refutes this claim. Since the photographs were taken by old technology, they are blured and fuzzy. Therefore, measuring the shadows and the position of the sun would not be measured percisely. Therefor, the photographs did not provide strong evidence that Peary reached to the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a trip to the North poleon April 7, 1909 , and provides three reasons of support. ...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... Geographic Society in order to conduct a research on whether Peary had reached to the Nor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...d wish to gain money from his adventure.Therefore, the committees explanation and decisio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'committees'' or 'committee's'?
Suggestion: committees'; committee's
...money from his adventure.Therefore, the committees explanation and decisions could be bias...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...om Averys sled was similar to the Pearys,but ,in fact, the weight of Pearys sled is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...erys sled was similar to the Pearys,but ,in fact, the weight of Pearys sled is slig...
^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... support Pearys claim. In the listetning , the professor refutes this claim. Since...
^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hotographs were taken by old technology, they are blured and fuzzy. Therefore, me...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291428571429 0.261695866417 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.162857142857 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0485714285714 0.0723426182421 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.04 0.0435111971325 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02 0.0277247811725 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114285714286 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0457142857143 0.0370669169778 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71786931594 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0257142857143 0.0208969081088 123% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131428571429 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00857142857143 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00285714285714 0.0114777025283 25% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1900.0 1645.83664459 115% => OK
No of words: 311.0 271.125827815 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10932475884 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395498392283 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27652733119 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186495176849 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131832797428 0.113142543107 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71786931594 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 54.3021715571 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4375 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6201404974 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.878197800319 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.39072847682 236% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.090233119 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.02564102564 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.789931958021 0.549887131256 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146169822613 0.142949733639 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0928968513199 0.0787303798458 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622467836176 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123457974586 0.139662658121 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.398783560538 0.266732575781 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11673544261 0.103435571967 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.474306645039 0.414875509568 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00903615693356 0.0530846634433 17% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.622671205791 0.40443939384 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052894877335 0.0528353158467 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.