According to the passage, Robert E. Peary was adventure and arctic explorer. The author claims that Peary reached the North Pole and he presents three evidence that prove their claims. Whereas, the lecturer says that present the evidence are not solid and unconvincing.
Firstly, the article emphasizes that committee of the nation geographic society investigate about the Peary account, the committee concludes that account was consistent and convincing evidence prove that Peary reaches to the North Pole. In contrast with this, the lecturer mentions that the committee who took the investigation was close friend of the Peary and they contribute fund for trip. In fact, the committee not proper examines record; therefore, presented evidence was not trustworthy.
Secondly, the passage implies that Tom Avery took less 37 days to reach the North Pole; So Peary claim was true that he reach the North Pole in 37 days. On the contrary with this, the speaker explains that Avery travels same as Peary but when Avery was travel that time climate was good but when Peary travels that time unfavorable weather and traveling not possible.
Thirdly, the author states that photograph with surf s position was stronger evidence that Peary reach the North Pole. However, the professor points out the photographs made by uses of the science technology. Precise photographs with surf s position mush cannot capture by old camera. Therefore, cannot prove that Peary reaches the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...hat Peary reaches to the North Pole. In contrast with this, the lecturer mentions that t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26582278481 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51093497717 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.560620007 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.534752715083 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195772689493 0.0996497079465 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143970631277 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338002642574 0.162205337803 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439652545359 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.