The article argues that Robert E.Peary told the truth about his expedition about North Pole. In my opinion I agree with lecture and the reasons have been explained Peary's claim might be not truth.
First, though the National geographic declared Peary really reached the North Pole, this report is contributing with bias. Because his friend who assisted him financially in this expedition had position in National Geography and certainly this relationship affected on results of report. So in this case we can not rely on National Geography as a significant reference.
Second, the speed theory has some missed points and it is not the strong proof about Peary's claim. Avery's food had been supplied by airplane in contradictory with Peary's trip. This made Avery's sled speedy more than Peary's. The other factor has been neglected in this theory is about weather condition in both trips that they were not the same. Lecture argues that Peary's trip was in an adverse weather condition and how he could be reach in these days to his destination.
finally, shadow measurement for finding the sun's position and hence the geographical location of photo is a scientific experiment. But this requires high quality photos to measure shadows accurately however Peary's photos were vague and unclear to calculate shadows and sun's position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
The article argues that Robert E.Peary told the truth about his expedition abo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...h in these days to his destination. finally, shadow measurement for finding the sun...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18055555556 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56726634409 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9064387441 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383046997667 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130173174904 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823055230294 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209132925878 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680302271623 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.