The reading passage contends that there are three arguments that support for the truth of Robert E. Peary’s claim. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradicts this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the reading passage that a committee that was instructed to conduct a thorough investigation of Peary’s records and equipment put together by the National Geographic Society. This is attributed to the fact that it is true that the committee was instructed to conduct thorough investigation of Peary’s records and equipment. However, the funder is a close friend of Peary and they did not examine his activity carefully. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the idea in the reading passage that Peary’s claim that he reached the North Pole in only 37 days after setting out from Ellesmere Island off the coast of Greenland is supported by a recent expedition. This is because when Tom Avery who is British explorer fellow the same trek Peary has traveled, the weather condition is quite different. When Peary has traveled, the weather was quite unfavorable to advance. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is refuted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea in the reading passage that taken by Peary, photographs support his claim that he has reached the North Pole. It is obvious that it was one hundred years ago when he took pictures during exploration. In addition, at that time, it was difficult to take a picture with clear as if today’s people are used to. The photographs are blurred and faded, not vivid. As a result, the reading passage’s final point is contradicted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage contends that there ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...points that contradicts this argument. First of all, the lecturer questions the...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage's first point is invalid. Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assage's second point is refuted. Last but not least, the lecturer disagre...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277456647399 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.147398843931 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693641618497 0.0723426182421 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462427745665 0.0435111971325 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.028901734104 0.0277247811725 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106936416185 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0433526011561 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94307121993 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0173410404624 0.0208969081088 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0028901734104 0.00154638098197 187% => OK
Determiners: 0.106936416185 0.128158765124 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0231213872832 0.0114777025283 201% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1771.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 285.0 271.125827815 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21403508772 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371929824561 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315789473684 0.287516216867 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20701754386 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143859649123 0.113142543107 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94307121993 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540350877193 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.6845262174 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1135287366 49.3711431718 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 132.220823453 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.5789473684 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.92207792208 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.676585676878 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143154171663 0.142949733639 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.139943509711 0.0787303798458 178% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566990456816 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161021693012 0.139662658121 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299823063323 0.266732575781 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165270269525 0.103435571967 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.453295269063 0.414875509568 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0348957874165 0.0530846634433 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.514629374656 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323637115921 0.0528353158467 61% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.