TPO 29-INTEGRATED TASK
Both the article and the lecturer discuss the hypothesis of the migration of edmontosaurs. On one hand, the article shows evidence in order to support this theory. On the other hand, the professor opposes by stating that the hypothesis is not convincing at all.
First and foremost, the reading attributes the hypothesis to the fact that edmontosaurs are herbivores. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the edmontosaurs didn't necessarily migrate to find food, which includes plants. He states that the North Slope was much warmer back then and there was, in fact, a good and harmonious condition for plants to grow in the summer. Consequently, when the winter came, edmontosaurs were able to gain nutrients from the abundance of dead plants.
In addition, the article posits that skeletons of edmontosaurs indicate that they lived in herds. Moreover, this behavior was similar to that of modern-day migratory animals so that edmontosaurs must have migrated. Nevertheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that there are many other reasons for edmontosaurs to have lived in herds, such as extra protection. For instance, he says that the Roosevelt Elks, which live in the forests in herds, don't migrate.
Last but not least, the reading indicates that the physical capability of edmontosaurs contributed to their migration. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. He argues that only adultery edmontosaurs were that strenuous. That being said, the juvenile ones must have slowed down the herd and the herd had to stay on the cold North Slope since the children edmontosaurs couldn't be left behind.
In conclusion, while the passage in the classroom discussion provides fascinating information with regards to the migration of edmontosaurs, we find that the argument of the article is flawed for the reasons mentioned by the professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecturer discus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hypothesis is not convincing at all. First and foremost, the reading attribut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s point by saying that the edmontosaurs didnt necessarily migrate to find food, which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from the abundance of dead plants. In addition, the article posits that ske...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ks, which live in the forests in herds, dont migrate. Last but not lea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the forests in herds, dont migrate. Last but not least, the reading indicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...h Slope since the children edmontosaurs couldnt be left behind. In conclu...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edmontosaurs couldnt be left behind. In conclusion, while the passage in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255192878338 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.157270029674 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0623145400593 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385756676558 0.0435111971325 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0178041543027 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151335311573 0.128828473217 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0356083086053 0.0370669169778 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92095113885 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296735905045 0.0208969081088 142% => OK
Particles: 0.00593471810089 0.00154638098197 384% => OK
Determiners: 0.13353115727 0.128158765124 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00593471810089 0.0158828679856 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00890207715134 0.0114777025283 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1942.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.47333333333 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356666666667 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226666666667 0.187439937562 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183333333333 0.113142543107 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92095113885 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.3427538736 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.75 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9205896555 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.39072847682 236% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 49.75 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.06944444444 1.90840788429 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.66845535349 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101176447751 0.142949733639 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0534132037457 0.0787303798458 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626769104387 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156876248104 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.319055534844 0.266732575781 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107275007183 0.103435571967 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.467668860864 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0483729185476 0.0530846634433 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.503298110392 0.40443939384 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353803489685 0.0528353158467 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.