The lecture and reading both discuss Sinosauropteryx. The reading claims that in 1996, scientist found kind of Sinosauropteryx fossils that have lines in their bones which displays that they had feathers. The lecture states that evident represent Sinosauropteryx had feathers which are very strong and the reading reasons' are very unconvinced.
First of all, the reading passage posits that this line of the structure of dinosaur are not belong to the structure and this line created after dinosaur become pass away. According to the reading this line after that formed as line of fossils. The lecture contradict this idea that when dinosaur dead, the fossils become decomposed and preserved volcanic ash and this bones belong to the other animal.
In addition, the reading hold the view that although this fine line created in the bones of dinosaur, the scientist cannot say what kind of structure has a line. According to the reading, some scientists said that, this line are trace of frills in the animal's fossils instead of feathers. The lecture dismisses this point due to the fact that this idea that this line were frills not convince and frills do not use protein unlike of the feathers. According to the lecture, definitely their structure had a feathers.
Lastly, the reading passage claims that the most important thing that some port of Sinosauropteryx's body has a feather such as tail and this feathers has role to regulate the temperature of body. The lecture refutes this claims by stating that this feather may not regulate the body temperature and because this feather on the tails show that structure of color such as white and brown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... which displays that they had feathers. The lecture states that evident represent S...
^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ne of the structure of dinosaur are not belong to the structure and this line created ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
... formed as line of fossils. The lecture contradict this idea that when dinosaur dead, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a feather' or simply 'feathers'?
Suggestion: a feather; feathers
...lecture, definitely their structure had a feathers. Lastly, the reading passage claims ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, may, so, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07299270073 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61234339323 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448905109489 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6754857664 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425429871822 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176337110813 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699020129768 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259548699695 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960524607458 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.