The reading and the lecture are discussing the phenomenon of the quakers sounds,which is heard by the Russian sailors in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The author of the article suggests three possible explanations for these sounds, however, the lecturer refutes all these explanations one by one.
First of all, the reading argues that these sounds maybe the sounds of some whale called Ocra, which lives in this area. These whales are known to make some noisy sounds during the time of courtship. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this suggestion by stating that although it is true that the Ocra whales live in this area, but they live near the surface of the water which would lead to being detected by the submarines or the sonar system.
Secondly, the reading mentions another possibility which is that these sounds could be the sounds of giant marine animal called Squid that lives in this area. The lecturer rebuts this claim by saying that these animal lived in this area all the time, and that does not explain why these sounds were heard in during two decades and then disappeared suddenly. If it was the sounds of the animals, it would continue to happen until now.
Finally, the reading mentions that these sounds may be the sounds of some secret hidden submarine that uses advanced technology that enables it to be undetected. In contrast, the lecturer argues against this claim by providing some scientific information that tells us that until now there is no submarine that is able to move so fast, besides, the engine of the submarine would be heard because of the noise, consequently, the submarine would be easily detected.
in conclusion, it is unlikely that any of the reasons that are mentioned in the reading passage to be the real reason of these sounds. The lecturer refuted all the given possible reasons effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ing the phenomenon of the quakers sounds,which is heard by the Russian sailors in the ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eard by the Russian sailors in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The author of...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ubmarine would be easily detected. in conclusion, it is unlikely that any of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91772151899 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43645403895 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496835443038 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3306001921 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06452816374 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302822552689 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11932038145 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646362567256 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157933489272 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915449941458 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.