According to the passage, strange voice detects by the Russian submarine in the north Atlantic and Arctic. The author presents the three theory behind the sound. Whereas, according to the lecture, professor says that it is true that odd sound produces in the ocean; it is the very debateable topic about this sound. The lecture cast doubt on the author provide the evidence.
Firstly, the passage claims that bizarre sound produced by the female orca whale to attract the male orca whale. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that sound of the orca was reasonable but unlike that provide the evidence because of the submarine travel inside of deep ocean and orca whale lie on the surface of the water, therefore impossible to detect the orca voice to submarine.
Secondly, the reading implies that giant squid was prey for large fish and sonar was not detectable because of boneless and soft body structure. Squid emit the sound when seeing to the submarine. However, the speaker explains that fist voice of squid detect in 1960 and it is complete disappear after two decades in 1980.
Lastly, the theory emphasizes that secretly patrolling submarine activity produce undetectable sonar. Instead of sonar, it produces frog-like sound. In contrast, the professor points out that no one engine made without noise and it is impossible to changing the direction of the submarine fast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...e without noise and it is impossible to changing the direction of the submarine fast.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06113537118 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43134599272 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56768558952 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5356716782 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338828150738 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120230065534 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520976553989 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191903760708 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170058030728 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.