The issue both the reading and the listening focus on is theories of undefined sounds heard by sailors in Russian submarines but the listening disagrees at three main points.
At the first point, it is stated in the reading that these underwater noises were communication between ocra whales. According to the listening, this theory is unconvincing. Although there are ocra whales living in mentioned areas but they lives near water surface and therefore, Russian submarines were unable to hear sound which they emitted. Moreover, whales are likely to tracked by radars of submarines.
At the second point, the reading believes that the strange sounds may originate from giant squid because of their lack of skeleton and soft bodies. On the contrary, the listening argues that the mystic sounds appeared only from 1960 to 1980 and disappeared after that but the squids still live until today.
At the last point, the reading argues that submarines of other countries could be the cause of the sounds. However, the listening confirmed that the sounds changed directions very quickly and it was impossible for submarines to do that. More notably, there was no engine sound like "quackers" which supports the listening perspective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...ales living in mentioned areas but they lives near water surface and therefore, Russi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30303030303 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77649189705 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1515006098 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333815731022 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116365976128 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795810148181 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188892482375 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583985317323 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.