The reading states that the sound quackers have some sources and provides three sources of these strange sounds. The professor, however, explains that the sound is very strange phnomenon and have some problems with the theories and refutes each the auhore's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the strange noises were the calls of male and female ocra whales during a courtship ritual. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is highly unlikely. She says that ocral whales live near the sourface of the ocean but the sound was detected in deep ocean.
Second, the reading states that the sound were caused by giant squid. The professor refutes this point by saying that althoug giant squid is a better candidate for source of the sound, it cannot be the source of the sound. She says that the sound existed about two decades but it disappeared for a decade. She mentions that it lives in the ocean, as a result, if the sound causes by giant squid it must not disappear for a decade.
Third, the reading states that the sound caused by some military technology. The professor explains that it could not caused by the technology. She says that the sound around changes quickly. But today technology have not so fast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ocean. Second, the reading states that the sound were caused by giant squid. Th...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...he professor explains that it could not caused by the technology. She says that the so...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79812206573 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21262779254 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7138529137 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6153846154 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292470923157 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118374569141 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612052781608 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188936236481 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256180297745 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.