TPO 33
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable hypothesizes regarding the main purpose of carved stones, which are types of round shape, artificial stone made in the late Neolithic period. However, finding all the ideas implusible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that carved stone had oriduced with the aim of hunt or fight. Conversely, the lecturer contend this idea that all the weapons attributing to that era such as ax were wearing. She adds that although the balls have cracks ond even were broken, the surface of them remains undamaged. Therefore, this usage for the craved stone seems infeasible.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that basic weighting system would be another dorable purpose for carved stone balls. On the contrary, the professor dimisses this idea by clarifying the fact that this theory is entierly impersuasive. In fact, having had various weight, craved stone balls could not have been applied in this way. She explains that the stone would have been practical for measurments purposes if they had been the same wight. Consequently, since varied types of stones were constituted these balls, which adittedly have various density, they have different weight. Subsequently, this application is not convincing as well.
Finally, the author asserts that the carved stone balls represent the social status of the prosperious individuals in that span of time. The professor, thought, repudiate this point by subscribing the fact that there are some imcompatible issues conserning this assuption. The first one is that all of the stone balls are simple and do not contain such intricate patterns. Moreover, the possession of the high ranked people were burrie with their death body, but none of these stones has been unearthed from the graves. SUbsequently, they could not have been served as a personal statuse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...g this assuption. The first one is that all of the stone balls are simple and do not conta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.225 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61126615601 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2322738297 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46277939742 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137470367454 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081934781874 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266502845994 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102713217056 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.