TPO 33
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable hypothesizes regarding the main purpose of carved stones ball, which are types of round shape, artificial stones made in the late Neolithic period. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that carved stone had produced with the aim of the hunt or the fight. Conversely, the lecturer contend this idea that all the weapons attributing to that era such as ax were wearing. She adds that although the balls have cracks and even some of them have been partially broken, the surface of them remains undamaged and well-preserved. Therefore, this usage for the craved stone seems infeasible.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that basic weighting system would be another doable purpose for carved stone balls. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea by clarifying the fact that this theory is entirely unpersuasive. In fact, having had various weights, craved stone balls could not have been applied in this way. She explains that the stone would have been practical for measurement purposes if they had been the same weight. Consequently, since varied types of stones were constituted these balls, which admittedly diverse densities are what differentiate the weight of different stones. Subsequently, this application is not convincing as well.
Finally, the author asserts that the carved stone balls represent the social status of the prosperous individuals in that span of time. The professor, thought, repudiate this point by subscribing the fact that there are some incompatible issues concerning this assumption. The first one is that all of the stone balls are simple and do not contain such intricate patterns. Moreover, the precious belongings of the high ranked people were buried with their death body, but none of these stones has been unearthed from the graves nonetheless. Subsequently, they could not have been served as a personal status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... this assumption. The first one is that all of the stone balls are simple and do not conta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, even so, in addition, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26268656716 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71694270804 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573134328358 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8591131576 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464805200396 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139193516698 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844423133801 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283885500418 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617208966718 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.