TPO 36
The lecturer explains cloud seeding may not be effective method in the U.S. and provides three reasons to support her idea.
At the first, the professore says laboratory experiments is not sufficient to support cloud seeding method for farms. Beucause in the real life adding silver iodide to cloud may be prevent any percipitation like snow and rain and as a result cause drought. The lack of water for crops had more damaging effect. In contrast, the reading passage states that adding silver iodide to cold water vapor in the laboratory cause formation of light snow.
Secondly, the professore states cloud seeding in asian countries had been did in the cites that have air pollution. Chemichal substaces in pollution help to improve effect of cloud seeding. But in the american cities, there is not any air pollution and therefore this mothod may be not effective.In contrast, the reading section argues that successfull performance of cloud seeding in some Asian countries will be repeat in the United states farm.
Finally, the professore states that reducing hail damage recently in the central United states can not be convinient. The result may be because of change of local weather instead of clould seeding. In contraray, the reading says local studies in a farming region in the central United States shows that could seading reduced hail damaged compared to perivous years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...drought. The lack of water for crops had more damaging effect. In contrast, the r...
^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrast, the reading passage states that adding silver iodide to cold water vapor...
^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de to cold water vapor in the laboratory cause formation of light snow. Secondly...
^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...oud seeding in asian countries had been did in the cites that have air pollution. C...
^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...refore this mothod may be not effective.In contrast, the reading section argues th...
^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...states can not be convinient. The result may be because of change of local weathe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12334801762 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54290742183 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546255506608 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7683971371 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.