The author rejects the possibility of human presence on Venus surface and provides three reasons to support his claim. On the other hand, the speaker refutes the author's reasons and discusses why human can inhabit the planet Venus.
First, the author argues that pressure at Venus is so high that any human craft will crush on the surface but the lecturer explains that also the pressure is high on Venus surface, the pressure in a place higher than surface decreases and it is possible to maintain a station at a distance of 50 Kilometer above the surface. He adds that the planet pressure at this distance is normal and close to Earth.
Second, the reading states that there are no water reserves on the planet and the atmosphere is made of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid which make it impossible for a human to live in. In addition, the author explains that we should supply our water and oxygen from Earth that is impractical. However, the professor suggests using certain chemical processes to produce water and oxygen from the planet's ingredient namely carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
Third, the author mentions the lack of sunlight on the surface to generate electricity, however the professor explains that since the station locates above the surface, enough sunlight can penetrate the dense Venus clouds in atmosphere. In addition, we can produce electricity from sunlight reflected from surface. In other words, we can use sun radiation from both direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: Kilometers
... maintain a station at a distance of 50 Kilometer above the surface. He adds that the pla...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...es to produce water and oxygen from the planets ingredient namely carbon dioxide and ni...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07755102041 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49317268505 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538775510204 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8787043504 49.2860985944 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384488202113 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139308287828 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515108266817 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210238426234 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397106617483 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.