In this set of materials, the reading passage explores the drawbacks of maintaining a human presence, such as the station, on Venus, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, he casts doubts on these disadvantages, and in the lecture, he provides three specific points to substantiate his opinion.
First, although the reading passage suggests that the atmosphere pressure at Venus' surface is too heavy for humans and for equipment, the professor argues in the lecture that the atmosphere pressure above ground is relatively same as Earth
's atmosphere pressure. Therefore, it is feasible for humans to construct a station floating in the air, like a hot bloom, on Venus.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that Venus contains sparse oxygen and is lack of water, but carbon dioxide and sulfuric is abundant, the professor contends that carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid can be used to produce water. Then he supports this point with the fact that by using equipment and chemical reaction in the station on Venus, humans can make water from the combination of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which are sufficient on Venus.
Finally, the professor asserts that clouds on Venus above ground are not thick and sunlight can penetrate through those clouds, whereas the author of the reading claims that clouds on Venus blocks most of the sunlight. The professor explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that solar power uses both direct and reflected sunlight to produce electricity. Therefore, humans can use electricity on Venus, which refutes the author’s point in the reading passage.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291946308725 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.127516778523 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0771812080537 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0268456375839 0.0435111971325 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0167785234899 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.161073825503 0.128828473217 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0167785234899 0.0370669169778 45% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.69338958411 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0134228187919 0.0208969081088 64% => OK
Particles: 0.00335570469799 0.00154638098197 217% => OK
Determiners: 0.114093959732 0.128158765124 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0134228187919 0.0158828679856 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00671140939597 0.0114777025283 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1638.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 264.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20454545455 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.42803030303 0.374372842146 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314393939394 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227272727273 0.187439937562 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125 0.113142543107 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69338958411 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 54.6270876675 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 29.3333333333 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.816416393 49.3711431718 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.0 132.220823453 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 0.878197800319 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.7727272727 50.5018328374 120% => OK
Elegance: 2.74509803922 1.90840788429 144% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.656098003325 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.161775364121 0.142949733639 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0978225446159 0.0787303798458 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.711032122854 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.217276638405 0.139662658121 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.344086252921 0.266732575781 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120134516607 0.103435571967 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322198553352 0.414875509568 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0938143086474 0.0530846634433 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421962785907 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107569364443 0.0528353158467 204% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.