The reading passage explores the issue that power companies think regulations for coal ash are unnecessary and even have negative affect, the professor's lecture deals with the same issue, however, she thinks that regulations and rules are needed for taking care of coal ash, and she uses three specific reasons to support her view.
First, even though the reading passage suggest that there are existed regulations requiring companies to use liner-special material to prevent the leak of coal ash to the environment, the professor argues in the lecture that existed regulations are not efficient, this is because companies only use liner-special material in new ponds, which means coal ash in old ponds remains a problem for environmental and they may leak to water and then cause water pollution.
Moreover, contrary to the statement of reading that regulations may discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products and customers might concerned that recycled coal ash products are dangerous, the professor contends that regulations will not affect customer's feeling towards recycled coal ash products. And she uses an example to support her idea, which is people are not afraid of using one kind of recycled products for about forty years, so that people are likely to buy recycled coal ash products.
Finally, the professor asserts that the cost of regulation is increased in a affordable way, whereas the author of the reading claims that the increasing cost is perhaps as much as ten times the current costs. The professor thinks this claim is indefensible and pointing out that the increase bill is only one percent than before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture deals with the same issue, however, she thinks that regulations and rules ar...
^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a affordable way" with adverb for "affordable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hat the cost of regulation is increased in a affordable way, whereas the author of the reading clai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the cost of regulation is increased in a affordable way, whereas the author of t...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.293706293706 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.174825174825 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0839160839161 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048951048951 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.020979020979 0.0277247811725 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118881118881 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0314685314685 0.0370669169778 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67686332558 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027972027972 0.0208969081088 134% => OK
Particles: 0.0034965034965 0.00154638098197 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.0874125874126 0.128158765124 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.013986013986 0.0158828679856 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013986013986 0.0114777025283 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1648.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1954887218 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37969924812 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312030075188 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206766917293 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139097744361 0.113142543107 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67686332558 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 51.3120434305 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 44.3333333333 21.7502111507 204% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 111.455023315 49.3711431718 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 274.666666667 132.220823453 208% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.3333333333 21.7502111507 204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.878197800319 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 75.5363408521 50.5018328374 150% => OK
Elegance: 1.81428571429 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.696590332987 0.549887131256 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.238962448034 0.142949733639 167% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0971252141627 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.858476333572 0.631733273073 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119477122685 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.395112502268 0.266732575781 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125142976548 0.103435571967 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.307762223191 0.414875509568 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0608494414088 0.0530846634433 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.472791251854 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636451909233 0.0528353158467 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.