The lecture protested against the three arguments presented in the passage about stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash.
First, the passage pointed out that regulations had existed which required companies to use liner-special material. As a result, stricter regulations are unnecessary. However, the lecturer argued that the old regulations did not work well in the sense that it only regulated the usage of new pump, while in the meantime, the old and existed pump had costed lots of damage to the environment. Thus, new regulation is required to solve this issue.
Next, the passage concerned that stricter regulation will prevent people from buying products that are made from recycled coal ashes. Nevertheless, the lecturer raised an example about mercury to assert that this won't necessary be the case. As everyone knows that mercury is dangerous and poisonous, consumers were still willing to buy recycled products made from mercury. Moreover, 50 years later, they still lived a healthy lives. That is to say, stricter rules have no direct impact on the safety of recycled products and thus this was not a reason for not creating new stricter rules.
Finally, the lecturer presented a simple mathematical analysis to fight against the last argument in the passage. By the professional analysts, the cost of electrical companies increased by the new regulation will be roughly fifteen billion. Namely, when averaged to every family, the additional expense will only increase about one percent. This small amount of increment won't incur objection from general public. Furthermore, this additional expenses are definitely worth it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t regulations had existed which required companies to use liner-special material....
^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'life'?
Suggestion: life
...years later, they still lived a healthy lives. That is to say, stricter rules have no...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... of increment wont incur objection from general public. Furthermore, this additional expenses ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as a result', 'that is to say']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233676975945 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.154639175258 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113402061856 0.0723426182421 157% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0652920962199 0.0435111971325 150% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0103092783505 0.0277247811725 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113402061856 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0481099656357 0.0370669169778 130% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73290897416 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0274914089347 0.0208969081088 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00343642611684 0.00154638098197 222% => OK
Determiners: 0.120274914089 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0103092783505 0.0158828679856 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103092783505 0.0114777025283 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1659.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 259.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40540540541 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.42471042471 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.351351351351 0.287516216867 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.258687258687 0.187439937562 138% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.113142543107 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73290897416 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 63.6453660824 53.8517498576 118% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2666666667 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.961415557 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 52.4018018018 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.71641791045 1.90840788429 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564097213725 0.549887131256 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.068163834248 0.142949733639 48% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0427841821263 0.0787303798458 54% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480322993115 0.631733273073 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.226451786443 0.139662658121 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186734013072 0.266732575781 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122187141935 0.103435571967 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294292342137 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0434082704404 0.0530846634433 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381424798212 0.40443939384 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592294390681 0.0528353158467 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.