TPO 42
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the solutions that can present in order to prevent birds' damages when they perceive glass as open air.
First, although reading claims that using one-way glasses can prevent birds hit to glass, professor argues that it would have as negative effect as clear glass because one-way glass can acts as mirror and reflects light and outdoor picture which may cause birds not to distinguish between fake pictures and reality. Thus, this solutions was rejected by mentioned explanations.
Second, the reading passage states that painting colorful lines or other art designs on regular windows can act as obstacle to birds which led them not perceive glass as open air. Nevertheless, the professor draws attention to the fact that birds might perceive these strips and designs as open wholes and try to fly through them, therefore, the problem of hitting to clear glass is exist. Furthermore, despite the idea of reading, which states that people can see out, professor believes that punting windows and glasses can make inside of building too dark for residents.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that glasses can be equipped to magnetic field which is able to guide birds to more safer paths. However, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that birds use their inner magnetic compass only when travel long distances such as moving from cold to warmer places and they don't use it in shorter destinations. Instead, they use sun light and their eyes in such short distances; thus, this solution is not effective either.
In summary, the professor have went totally against the solutions presented in the reading passage. It states that scientist should hold more researches to find appropriate ways to cope with this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...etween fake pictures and reality. Thus, this solutions was rejected by mentioned exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...c field which is able to guide birds to more safer paths. However, the professor disproves...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing from cold to warmer places and they dont use it in shorter destinations. Instead...
^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...her. In summary, the professor have went totally against the solutions presented...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in short, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15282392027 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38698712414 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574750830565 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7967421869 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458171001831 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158983785342 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947756195946 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234321297764 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104141892838 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.