The lecturer contends that none of the three solutions provided by the reading passage can stop birds getting injured by glass windows. He casts doubt on each solution and states the flaw of each one, as is presented below.
The flaw of the first solution is that the outside of one-way glass reflects as a mirror while birds do not know what is a mirror. To be more specific, the outside of one-way glass windows will reflect sky and trees, which will make birds consider them as real sky and trees. As a result, they may fly directly to the one-way glass windows and get injured by these windows.
In addition, problems exist in the second solution. According to the reading passage, there will be openings between strips on the colorful windows. However, the lecturer mentions that birds would consider these openings as holes so that they may try to fly through the holes. To prevent them flying through the holes, people would set these openings as small as possible. As a result, the rooms with these kind of window will be dark, which is not a good idea to human.
Moreover, the third solution will not work well as showed by the lecturer. He emphasizes that birds navigate themselves by magnetic fields only when they are travelling for a long distance, such as migrating in winter. However, when they have short trips, such as fly from one side of a city to the other side, they rely on eyes and brightness of lights to navigate themselves. Therefore, creating artificial magnetic fields will not work because birds fly only for a short distance in the city and will not be affected by the artificial magnetic fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...s possible. As a result, the rooms with these kind of window will be dark, which is not a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72027972028 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35814730704 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506993006993 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7363729103 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416444553975 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128274945799 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064758246733 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224488860131 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524534681775 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.