TPO 43
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the different theories of agnostids living behavior and nutrition.
First, the reading passage claimed that the agnostids might have been free-swimming hunters that caught small and tiny animals because they were good and vibrant swimmers and due to existence of other smaller organisms in ancient oceans, they could access to rich sources of food easily. Howeer, professor sees that all of other types of predator were equipped with strong eyes which allowed them to track prays and hunt them while agnostids were kind of blind creatures and they would have other senses in order to detect victims but there is no evidence that they had developed such senses.
Second, the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading about considering agnostids as a seafloor dwellers because seafloor creatures usually prefer to move slowly and take advantage of smaller geographical area to capture prays, but agnostids were fast-moving organisms which could able to swim swiftly.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that agnostids were probably parasites which stayed in larger organism's body and feed off them; organisms like primitive fish or other larger animals. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that parasites are limited in population because if their population increase in hostage's body, they would kill it and lose a rich source of food. But, as evidences indicate, agnostids' population was very large and they couldn't be live in other species body, therefore, she repudiated the theory of parasites.
In summary, the professor has gone totally against the theories presented in the reading passage. It stated that agnostids weren't be free-swimming predators as well as seafloor dwellers; in addition, they couldn't be parasites too. So, scientists should do more researched in order to shed light on this ambiguous issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...obably parasites which stayed in larger organisms body and feed off them; organisms like ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...tids population was very large and they couldnt be live in other species body, therefor...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ading passage. It stated that agnostids werent be free-swimming predators as well as s...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...as seafloor dwellers; in addition, they couldnt be parasites too. So, scientists should...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in summary, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37741935484 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57662792161 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.165785354 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.7 110.228320801 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403718263423 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15157002587 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929485111724 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210166255289 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710469411376 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.3589403974 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.