TPO 44
The reading passage claims that some archeologist believes that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake. However, the lecturer casts serious doubt on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She argues that proofs in this claim are not convincing also other archeological have another opinion that there are some record which show that these coins do not fake.
Firstly, the lecturer contends that there were several objects that come from long distances due to, Native American can travel to the other side of the country, in order to obtain some new things, therefore it is possible that they bring coins from Norse settlement. This, however, is contradict to the passage mentions that the distance the Maine site and the Norse settlement suggest that the coin has no real connection with the settlements.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that no other coins have been found on the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse, thus they did not bring any silver coin. In contrast, she clearly states that the Norse did not have any permanent settlement moreover, they packed up all their possessions when they came back to the Europe, hence we can conclude that maybe their coins consist of their staffs and brought them back.
Finally, the speaker points out that everything that look unusual is really valuable for Native Americans in addition the silver coin is really appealing to them thanks to its beauty because people in Norse could make attractive jewelries and necklaces additionally trade with Native American because they were really crazy about these kind of things. Nonetheless, the text asserts that Norse who traveled to North America would have understood that silver coins would most likely be useless to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...rom Norse settlement. This, however, is contradict to the passage mentions that the distan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...an because they were really crazy about these kind of things. Nonetheless, the text assert...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48988962418 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578595317726 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7600487311 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2222222222 21.698381199 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.5555555556 7.06452816374 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535728140321 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218002445987 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114038853158 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291236531784 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660619926373 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.