According to the passage, in the past animals were larger than today because of the three factors such as greater amount of oxygen, nutrients and warmer climate. However, the lecture contradicts the reading presented reasons and gives three explanations to fail author's views.
Firstly, the lecturer mentions that in past less oxygen concentration than today because of volcanic activities and poisonous gas. Therefore, reason presents that oxygen was responsible to greater animal growth were meaningless. In contrast, the reading states that oxygen rich atmosphere foster to growth of the animals.
Secondly, the speaker explains that it is true that high available plants and foods but no nutrients in earlier time. Fossil suggests that scarcity of the nutrients because plant need carbon dioxide to make nutrition but contaminated carbon dioxide were not useful. On the other hand, according to the reading, adequate nutrients and food to promote to increase the body size animals.
Thirdly, the professor points out that warmer environment animal need more energy to cooling their body temperature as result, release temperature rather than growing cell. Whereas, the reading implies that not need energy in warmer condition and it is use to generate body cell to make larger body.
In conclusion, it is clearly observed that the idea depicted in the reading has been refute by speaker with sufficient evidence and example.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ed energy in warmer condition and it is use to generate body cell to make larger bo...
^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ed energy in warmer condition and it is use to generate body cell to make larger bo...
^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'refuted'.
Suggestion: refuted
...e idea depicted in the reading has been refute by speaker with sufficient evidence and...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43497757848 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62367480619 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587443946188 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7577303644 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.181818182 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06452816374 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188772740101 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694207835239 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488344346223 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930477630846 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460345517468 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.