The article discusses the intersting topic that why many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are at present. However, the lecture in the audio refutes the reasons given in the reading passage in support of the fact. The article uses three main factors in support of the answer.
First, high oxygen level in the earth's environment. The article states that large amount of oxygen supply in the earth's environment stimulated the growth of species. Secondly, abundant food supply, it states that past earth's environment being rich in nutrients and plant life encouraged the growth within the body of species. Thirdly, warm weather of earth, supports the idea that since, earth temperature was warm, animals could use energy to produce growth generating cells instead of keeping body warm.
However, the lecture falsifies and disagrees with relating species growth to any of the supporting reasons. According to audio, earth's environment in the past was more prone and active in volcanic activities which in turn resulted in the release of harmful and poisonous gases in the atmosphere and less oxygen. On the account of second refuted reason, the scientists have found many fossils with scarce nutrients and more carbon dioxide. Lastly, large bodies need more warmth than smaller ones and in order to maintain and balance body temperature with the environment they had to utilise energy, which denies the fact of utilising body energy to produce species growth cells in the body.
All these factors points that the large size of animals in the past has nothing in common with the supporting details. Thereby, completely denied of fact. Therefore pointing to the fact that the hypothesis in the article has no valid reasons to support the main idea of the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...wer. First, high oxygen level in the earths environment. The article states that la...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...at large amount of oxygen supply in the earths environment stimulated the growth of sp...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...undant food supply, it states that past earths environment being rich in nutrients and...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ls. Thereby, completely denied of fact. Therefore pointing to the fact that the hypothesi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13745704467 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45320874239 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529209621993 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2703024585 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278471024301 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912564756923 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700274697795 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158702109819 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711960192354 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.