The lecture and the reading both are about the issue of using electronic medical records. Whereas the author believes that there are actually three advantages of using electronic medical records, the lecturer is cautious against them.
First is the issue of reducing cost. Th professor argues that using data bases will not provide any saving, since doctors still have to keep paper records as a backup in case there is any damage of the electronic one. They also use paper format as legal signed document. Consequently, storage space still needed. Because of this the lecturer thinks that the author did not see the hole image.
Second issue is eliminating errors. The lecturer points out that electronic medical records will nor eliminate errors due to illegible doctors hand writing because, doctors are not responsible to enter the information in the system, and so employee still have to read the doctors writing which may not be very clear. That is why the lecturer thinks that this point is not convincing.
Final issue is aiding research. The professor puts forth the idea that ,in US, patients` medical records are protected by strict laws, and that makes it not easy to researchers to explore them. She said that patients is only person who can give permission to use their personal medical information. However the author feels that adapting electronic system will allow researcher to have convenient access ton medical information, which is impossible in paper-based records.
Basically, the professor and the lecturer discusses the pitfalls and merits of adapting electronic medical records in US.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h professor argues that using data bases will not provide any saving, since docto...
^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nsequently, storage space still needed. Because of this the lecturer thinks that the au...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... The professor puts forth the idea that ,in US, patients' medical records ar...
^^
Line 8, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...use their personal medical information. However the author feels that adapting electron...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at adapting electronic system will allow researcher to have convenient access ton...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, however, may, second, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61475105448 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.8561786141 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418163949404 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11914696939 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852435259262 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230286937771 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417079022924 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.