TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered

In this set of materials the lecturer and author discusses about pterosaurs's ability to take a flight. The author suggests that pterosaurs cannot fly in sky and provides few reasons for this assumptions. The lecturer however, refutes to each and every point mentioned in the passage.

First of all, the lecturer points out that the recent fossil records of pterosaurs shows that, they had some thick fur on their body. This is usually a characteristic of warm blooded animal. So as per that, pterosaurs had enough metabolism to create ample amount of energy to fly in air. On contrast, the writer asserts that pterosaurs being cold blooded were not capable of generating so much energy to take a flight.

In addition, the speaker posits that the pterosaurs had very special anatomical feature which was hollowness in it's bones. Owing to this feature, the pterosaurs had very light body weight despite of it's big size; which make them perfectly capable of flapping wings during their flight. This point is refuted in article. The author proposes that pterosaurs's heavy body made it difficult to fly in air.

Finally, the professor also opposes the point mentioned in the passage that pterosaurs could not jump or run fast in order to take flight. He provides some evidence that pterosaurs unlike birds, were using all four limbs and to jump or run fast during their flight. There weakness in hind legs did not cause any hindrance for their running or jumping.
In this set of materials the lecturer and author discusses about pterosaurs's ability to take a flight. The author suggests that pterosaurs cannot fly in sky and provides few reasons for this assumptions. The lecturer however, refutes to each and every point mentioned in the passage.

First of all, the lecturer points out that the recent fossil records of pterosaurs shows that, they had some thick fur on their body. This is usually a characteristic of warm blooded animal. So as per that, pterosaurs had enough metabolism to create ample amount of energy to fly in air. On contrast, the writer asserts that pterosaurs being cold blooded were not capable of generating so much energy to take a flight.

In addition, the speaker posits that the pterosaurs had very special anatomical feature which was hollowness in it's bones. Owing to this feature, the pterosaurs had very light body weight despite of it's big size; which make them perfectly capable of flapping wings during their flight. This point is refuted in article. The author proposes that pterosaurs's heavy body made it difficult to fly in air.

Finally, the professor also opposes the point mentioned in the passage that pterosaurs cannot jump or run fast in order to take flight. He provides some evidence that pterosaurs unlike birds, were using all four limbs and to jump or run fast during their flight. There weakness in hind legs did not cause any hindrance for their running or jumping.

The lecturer concluded that pterosaurs were perfectly able to fly in air in spite of their body weight and size due to their significant anatomical features.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fly in sky and provides few reasons for this assumptions. The lecturer however, refu...
^^^^
Line 8, column 187, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fly in sky and provides few reasons for this assumptions. The lecturer however, refu...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, in addition, first of all, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 30.3222958057 244% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 1373.03311258 188% => OK
No of words: 517.0 270.72406181 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99419729207 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.04702891845 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53128607802 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.286266924565 0.540411800872 53% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 419.366225166 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 17.0 8.23620309051 206% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 13.0662251656 222% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.375868814 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0344827586 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8275862069 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65517241379 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323666720386 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104058923408 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072439981275 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185302365033 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07457537343 0.0443174109184 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.25 8.42419426049 74% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.