The lecture and passage both discusses about methods of protecting frogs from extinction. The article proposes three methods that can be used in order to protect the frog population. The lecturer however, refutes to each and every method mentioned in the article.
First of all, the text suggests to prohibit farmers to use pesticides in the frog sensitive areas, as they are really harmful to them. The pesticides can attack frog's nervous system and can cause breathing problems. The speaker disagrees with this suggestion. He argues that the farmers will lose their crops to pests. They would not be able to remain competitive with the farmers in other region who are using the pesticides and producing crops in abundance. They will have to face severe economical loss.
In addition, the frogs are suffered with deadly fungal infections. So, in order to protect them, some anti-fungal treatments medications should be provided to the frogs. On the contrary, the professor posits that it is not a practical solution, because scientists will have to catch each individual frog for applying anti -fungal medication. Even after applying the medication, the frogs can still transmit the fungal infection to their offspring. They will have to reapply the medication to the newer frogs as well. It is not only expensive but also very complicated method.
Finally, one more proposal given by the author is to decline the use of water resources by the humans, that are especially breeding grounds for the frog population. The orator on the other hand disagrees with this solution and points out that the main problem is not the use of wetlands but global warming. The water in wetlands and lakes are getting dry due to global warming and not because of overuse by human activities and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n order to protect the frog population. The lecturer however, refutes to each and e...
^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests prohibiting'.
Suggestion: suggests prohibiting
... the article. First of all, the text suggests to prohibit farmers to use pesticides in the frog s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...bundance. They will have to face severe economical loss. In addition, the frogs are suf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r applying the medication, the frogs can still transmit the fungal infection to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, really, so, still, well, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63007136471 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0969434567 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418341420125 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118035067082 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741765706788 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229836194091 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299030269799 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.