TPO 49
The reading passage asserts that humpback whales which migrate long distances use stars for navigating. Although the speaker claims that this reason is fascinating, she finds all reasons unconvincing and provids some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that due to humpbacks whales' intelligence, they use stars to navigate by, because they are intelligent. In contrast, the speaker states that there is no relationship between intelligence and using stars to navigate by. For example, birds and ducks use stars to navigate by, but ducks are not intelligent animals and its intelligence is average. So, the animal's intelligent does not prove using stars to navigated by.
Second, the reading passage asserts that humpback whales migrate in straight lines which means they orient themselves by some external objects or forces like stars.On the contrary, The professor brings the idea that animals have a substance in the brain, biomagnetic, which makes the animal sensitive to earth magnetic field, and animals use the biomagnetic rather than stars for navigation.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that humpback whales exhibit an unusual behavior which is known as spy-hopping. By this way, they look at stars which are providing them information to navigated by. The speaker takes an opposite viewpoint and believes that spy-hopping has nothing to do. For example, sharks have this ability and not only they do not migrate and do not look at the stars, but also the use this ability for hunting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...e external objects or forces like stars.On the contrary, The professor brings the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, look, second, so, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30578512397 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67300120749 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.3282863485 49.2860985944 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.727272727 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.