According to the passage three explanations to humpback whales navigating by the stars. Whereas, the lecturer says that humpback traveling long distance is interesting things but the article provides evidence is skeptical that navigation by the stars.
Firstly, the passage claims that humpback whales highly intelligent to navigate by the stars and brain has cognitive abilities uses for night sky orientation. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that no connection between the intelligent and animals. Some birds have cognitive abilities but it is average such as duck migration; they migrate by their own intelligence, not cognitive abilities. Intelligent use for navigating by a star is impossible.
Secondly, the article implies that humpback whales migrate in straight direction by the external forces and object. On the contrary, the speaker explains that humpback does not migrate by the external force or object but their body has the biomagnetic sense to earth magnetic field and orient themselves.
Thirdly, the passage states that spy hopping function helps to navigate the humpback whales. However, the lecturer points out that spy hopping is a rare thing for navigation. Another marine animal has also this function such as shark but they do not migrate by stars orientation. If spy hopping is used for migration, so what can whales does in the day time that time stars disappear. As result spy hopping is ambiguous evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y migrate by their own intelligence, not cognitive abilities. Intelligent use for...
^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'whale'
Suggestion: whale
...ping is used for migration, so what can whales does in the day time that time stars di...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the day time that time stars disappear. As result spy hopping is ambiguous evidenc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38053097345 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80776531929 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0020926007 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5384615385 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454120349034 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152506852556 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079292516196 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251062122752 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522337389769 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.