tpo16
The article states that the science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitation in Britain. However, the professor mentions that in 1990 a new guide line was adapted, and helped to solve all the problems that mentioned in the article, and this clearly disagrees with what the Author’s wrote.
First, the reading asserts that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The professor refutes this point by saying that in the new guide line, before any construction’s site would start, an archaeologist must observes the site and declares that the site doesn’t have any artifacts. She adds that if the archaeologist found anything, the construction must changes the place or builds near the old site but not at the same spot.
Second, the article posits that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for research was inadequate. On the other hand, the professor contends that after the new guide line the archaeologists have a new source of financial support rather than the government. According to the professor, the construction’s company needs to pay for the archaeologist to work for their site and declare that it doesn’t contain any artifact.
Third, the article claims that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology because there were never many positions available. The professor refutes this point by saying that after the constructional guide line approved, expert archaeologists needed and hired in all constructional sites. She adds that this action creates many jobs and more people want to have a career in archaeology in Britain.
all the problems that mentioned in the article
all the problems that are mentioned in the article
all the problems mentioned in the article
Sentence: However, the professor mentions that in 1990 a new guide line was adapted, and helped to solve all the problems that mentioned in the article, and this clearly disagrees with what the Author's wrote.
Description: A noun, singular, common, genitive is not usually followed by a verb, past tense
Suggestion: Refer to Author's and wrote
Sentence: The professor refutes this point by saying that in the new guide line, before any construction's site would start, an archaeologist must observes the site and declares that the site doesn't have any artifacts.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to must and observes
Sentence: She adds that if the archaeologist found anything, the construction must changes the place or builds near the old site but not at the same spot.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to must and changes
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 258 250
No. of Characters: 1312 1200
No. of Different Words: 130 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.008 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.085 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.868 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.706 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.637 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4