TPO25
In this set of material, the reading passage states that the clay jars including copper cylinders are not likely to be used as electric batteries in ancient times and brings up three reasons to support. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas unconvincing and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that no wire or electricity conductors were found in the area that vessels were excavated. In contrast, the lecturer declares that absence of wires and conductors can be explained by the fact that the vessels discovered by local people who were not trained archeologists. They might have found other objects but the objects were not recognized and overlooked or thrown away.
Furthermore, the reading passage argues that the copper cylinders were used to preserve scrolls. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that although the vessels resemble the holder of the scrolls, this does not prove anything. In fact, this can explain how the first ancient battery have been invented because it is possible that the vessels were utilized to preserve scroll and that the inventors later identified that they can use the copper cylinders with iron rod to produce electricity.
Finally, it is mentioned in the reading passage that ancient people did not have any electrical devise to use the electricity so producing electricity did not make any sense for them. Conversely, the lecturer explains that the electricity can be applied to make a mild shock or used as an invisible magical power. In addition, the generated electricity can have a healing usage and exploited as a motivation for muscles as it is used nowadays in medical situations.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243333333333 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.203333333333 0.158904122519 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.06 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0466666666667 0.0435111971325 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233333333333 0.0277247811725 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0370669169778 180% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7081242894 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0266666666667 0.0208969081088 128% => OK
Particles: 0.00333333333333 0.00154638098197 216% => OK
Determiners: 0.13 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02 0.0158828679856 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01 0.0114777025283 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1694.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 278.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09352517986 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377697841727 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31654676259 0.287516216867 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215827338129 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13309352518 0.113142543107 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7081242894 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.5443900837 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 25.2727272727 21.7502111507 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.863615222 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 132.220823453 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.7502111507 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.878197800319 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 56.9274035317 50.5018328374 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.57317073171 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.757851932059 0.549887131256 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.154861388434 0.142949733639 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650365752437 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.679502359145 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.100424027039 0.139662658121 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.380021129666 0.266732575781 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113584797453 0.103435571967 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.413250605634 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0861949375658 0.0530846634433 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.532183975461 0.40443939384 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919499449933 0.0528353158467 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.