tpo27
Both the reading and lecture are about the strange little ice age which occurred in the world from 1300 to 1900CE. The reading provides three hypotheses for the mentioned event and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on claims made in the article and finds all of arguments out of date and dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that before beginning the ice age, there was the unusual warm climate which caused glaciers to melt; hence, a huge cold freshwater entered to Gulf stream. The aforementioned stream is a large ocean which affects Earth's climate. Briefly, this event could create the disruption in the ocean currents and the little ice age started. This point is challenged by the professor and he points out that nowadays, researchers have understood that Gulf Stream can have impacts on North America and Europe; however, the ice age was a global phenomenon and it occurred in South Africa and New Zealand too.
Secondly, the article contends that it may have happened by volcanic eruption series; therefore, dark clouds including dust and sulfur gas blocked the sunlight from reaching Earth's surface and the climate became cold; in contrast, the lecturer expresses that if this suggestion is true, so other changes had to be observed by people such as visual effects like grey snow instead of white and colorful sunlight; however, any document has not be reported by humans at that time.
Finally, the reading passage states that when the ice age happened, the human beings population may have declined; consequently, few trees were cut down by people and a lot of carbon dioxide was absorbed by trees and weather got cooler and cooler. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and he poses that there could not be enough time for this hypothesis. He elaborates on this by mentioning that human population grew quickly and people started planting more crops for supplying their food and even they cut down a great number of trees and again Carbon dioxide returned atmosphere. As you see, the reduction of population did not last for long-term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...sunlight; however, any document has not be reported by humans at that time. Fin...
^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...at when the ice age happened, the human beings population may have declined; consequen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98285714286 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47089176664 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597142857143 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.706737805 49.2860985944 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413013490698 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135081918238 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867539018987 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211934685901 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110578251742 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.